MODEL CAPABILITY · PRICE & RELEASES

Value

Artificial Analysis · Compare benchmark results, text costs and release dates separately, with each model and configuration identified.

Data as of2026-10-30 · 42 configurations

Methodology & original report ↗

Value comparison

Index ≥30 · best-value configuration per developer · 3:1 input/output token mix.

Chart data · 9 entries
NameIndex / USD cost
Claude Haiku 5.5181.173
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 101761.885
GPT-6.1 Terra25.488
Gemini 3.8 Flash20.365
GLM-5.314.723
Grok 4.711.671
Kimi K3.1 Pro11.501
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)11.185
Muse Wonder5.416

Input and output prices for the same models

Same configurations as the top 8 in the value chart · USD per million tokens · input and output billed separately.

InputOutput
Chart data · 8 entries
NameInput / output
Claude Haiku 5.50.1 / 0.5
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10170.3 / 1.2
GPT-6.1 Terra1 / 5
Gemini 3.8 Flash0.75 / 3.75
GLM-5.31.4 / 4.4
Grok 4.72 / 6
Kimi K3.1 Pro2 / 10
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)2 / 6

ValueDetails

Sorted by value, with reasoning configurations kept separate. Requires a capability index of at least 30; text costs use a 3:1 input/output mix.

On this page2records
  1. 41

    Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback)

    Anthropic

    Capability index
    42.97
    Input / million tokens
    $10
    Output / million tokens
    $50
    Value · 3:1 usage mix
    2.1
  2. 42

    Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)

    Anthropic

    Capability index
    38.48
    Input / million tokens
    $10
    Output / million tokens
    $50
    Value · 3:1 usage mix
    1.9
Ranking criteria & test conditions
  • Intelligence scores come from the same leaderboard snapshot. Reasoning configurations remain separate; estimated scores and retired models are excluded from the highlights.
  • Release dates follow the report and are separate from our update dates. Undated models are excluded from recent releases. A report’s date is not treated as independent proof of an official model release.
  • Text prices use USD per million tokens, with input and output stored separately. Subscription, cache and media charges are not mixed into this comparison.
  • Value picks require an intelligence score of at least 30 and rank by score ÷ (3 × input price + output price) × 4, selecting the highest value for each developer. This assumes a 3:1 text input/output ratio; actual task costs vary.
  • Developer highlights show one representative per developer. Model aliases and reasoning configurations are not automatically mapped to a specific catalog version. Full results retain the original configurations and missing values.
  • This snapshot uses Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0. Different index versions are not directly comparable.

Charts are calculated from the full report, independently of the detail page. Release activity uses release dates, not changes in model capability over time. Missing prices are not zero costs.