Project benchmark

CompassBench 2026-07 · Knowledge

OpenCompass · 15 configurations with published scores. Review each metric and its test conditions separately.

Report identity & conditions

Data as of2026-10-19· Report published—. See individual records for run dates and test conditions.

Leaderboard updated

  • This leaderboard uses OpenCompass’s closed benchmark sets. Questions update quarterly, and models may be added between quarters. Quarters and tasks are compared separately.
  • Overall and task scores follow the original leaderboard. We do not recalculate overall weights or interpret scores as question accuracy.
  • The same model configurations appear across five task scopes. Reasoning settings stay in the names; adding row counts does not give a count of unique models.
  • Organizations, parameter counts, release dates and release types follow the report. An open-weight label does not imply an open license; use depends on the model’s terms.
  • Quarterly versions and leaderboard update dates are kept separate. Actual test dates and individual sample counts are not stated.
  • Results: official OpenCompass leaderboard.
  • Quarterly version: 2026-07; leaderboard updated: 2026-08-24.
Read the original report ↗

Compare metrics within the same report. Each chart explains its direction and scope.
See the details for full values and run conditions.

Knowledge score

Original scores from this quarter’s closed benchmark; higher is better. Overall and task values are retained and are not ranked across quarters or tasks.: showing 8 of 15 records with values. See details for configurations and dates.

Chart data · 8 entries
Name points
Claude Opus 5 (high)94.1
Gemini-3.7-Flash94
Grok-4.6 (high)93.8
DeepSeek-V4-Pro92.5
GLM-5.391.9
Doubao-Seed-2.1-Pro-260628 (high)91.4
Kimi-K3 (high)90.3
Kimi-K2.6 (high)89.8

Natural sciences score

Original scores from this quarter’s closed benchmark; higher is better. Overall and task values are retained and are not ranked across quarters or tasks.: showing 8 of 15 records with values. See details for configurations and dates.

Chart data · 8 entries
Name points
Claude Opus 5 (high)97.5
DeepSeek-V4-Pro97.1
Grok-4.6 (high)95.8
Gemini-3.7-Flash95
GLM-5.393.3
Kimi-K3 (high)92.5
Doubao-Seed-2.1-Pro-260628 (high)91.7
MiniMax-M390.8

Full results & model versions

15 / 15configurations have published scores in this scope. Scored configurations are listed; missing values remain “Not provided.” Different run configurations of the same model are listed separately.

Gemini-3.7-Flash

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Google · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Knowledge score
94 分
Natural sciences score
95 分
Humanities score
94.2 分
Engineering score
95.8 分
Social sciences score
92.1 分
Common sense score
92.9 分

GLM-5.3

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Zhipu AI · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Knowledge score
91.9 分
Natural sciences score
93.3 分
Humanities score
92.1 分
Engineering score
95.4 分
Social sciences score
88.8 分
Common sense score
90 分

Kimi-K3 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Moonshot · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 2.8T · Open weights

Knowledge score
90.3 分
Natural sciences score
92.5 分
Humanities score
92.1 分
Engineering score
88.3 分
Social sciences score
90.4 分
Common sense score
87.9 分

Hy3-preview (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Tencent · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 295B · Open weights

Knowledge score
85.6 分
Natural sciences score
88.8 分
Humanities score
83.8 分
Engineering score
85 分
Social sciences score
86.3 分
Common sense score
84.2 分

Doubao-Seed-2.1-Pro-260628 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: ByteDance · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Knowledge score
91.4 分
Natural sciences score
91.7 分
Humanities score
92.5 分
Engineering score
94.6 分
Social sciences score
87.5 分
Common sense score
90.8 分

GPT-5.5 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: OpenAI · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Knowledge score
87.7 分
Natural sciences score
88.8 分
Humanities score
87.9 分
Engineering score
84.6 分
Social sciences score
90 分
Common sense score
87.1 分

GPT-5.6-Sol (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: OpenAI · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Knowledge score
88.5 分
Natural sciences score
89.2 分
Humanities score
90.8 分
Engineering score
84.2 分
Social sciences score
92.1 分
Common sense score
86.3 分

Kimi-K2.6 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Moonshot · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 1T · Open weights

Knowledge score
89.8 分
Natural sciences score
90 分
Humanities score
92.5 分
Engineering score
90.8 分
Social sciences score
85.8 分
Common sense score
89.6 分

Qwen3.8-Max

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Alibaba · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 2.4T · Open weights

Knowledge score
86.8 分
Natural sciences score
88.3 分
Humanities score
90 分
Engineering score
80.4 分
Social sciences score
87.9 分
Common sense score
87.5 分

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: DeepSeek · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 1.6T · Open weights

Knowledge score
92.5 分
Natural sciences score
97.1 分
Humanities score
95 分
Engineering score
90.8 分
Social sciences score
87.1 分
Common sense score
92.5 分

Grok-4.6 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: xAI · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Knowledge score
93.8 分
Natural sciences score
95.8 分
Humanities score
95.8 分
Engineering score
94.2 分
Social sciences score
92.5 分
Common sense score
90.8 分

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: DeepSeek · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 284B · Open weights

Knowledge score
84.5 分
Natural sciences score
84.2 分
Humanities score
90 分
Engineering score
83.3 分
Social sciences score
87.1 分
Common sense score
77.9 分

Claude Opus 4.8 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Anthropic · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Knowledge score
87.5 分
Natural sciences score
89.6 分
Humanities score
90.4 分
Engineering score
84.2 分
Social sciences score
87.5 分
Common sense score
85.8 分

MiniMax-M3

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: MiniMax · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 428B · Open weights

Knowledge score
86.6 分
Natural sciences score
90.8 分
Humanities score
87.1 分
Engineering score
88.3 分
Social sciences score
82.5 分
Common sense score
84.2 分

Claude Opus 5 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Anthropic · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Knowledge score
94.1 分
Natural sciences score
97.5 分
Humanities score
92.9 分
Engineering score
93.3 分
Social sciences score
94.6 分
Common sense score
92.1 分