Project benchmark

CompassBench 2026-07 · Code

OpenCompass · 15 configurations with published scores. Review each metric and its test conditions separately.

Report identity & conditions

Data as of2026-10-19· Report published—. See individual records for run dates and test conditions.

Leaderboard updated

  • This leaderboard uses OpenCompass’s closed benchmark sets. Questions update quarterly, and models may be added between quarters. Quarters and tasks are compared separately.
  • Overall and task scores follow the original leaderboard. We do not recalculate overall weights or interpret scores as question accuracy.
  • The same model configurations appear across five task scopes. Reasoning settings stay in the names; adding row counts does not give a count of unique models.
  • Organizations, parameter counts, release dates and release types follow the report. An open-weight label does not imply an open license; use depends on the model’s terms.
  • Quarterly versions and leaderboard update dates are kept separate. Actual test dates and individual sample counts are not stated.
  • Results: official OpenCompass leaderboard.
  • Quarterly version: 2026-07; leaderboard updated: 2026-08-24.
Read the original report ↗

Compare metrics within the same report. Each chart explains its direction and scope.
See the details for full values and run conditions.

Code score

Original scores from this quarter’s closed benchmark; higher is better. Overall and task values are retained and are not ranked across quarters or tasks.: showing 8 of 15 records with values. See details for configurations and dates.

Chart data · 8 entries
Name points
GPT-5.5 (high)96.5
GPT-5.6-Sol (high)96.3
Qwen3.8-Max95.5
Claude Opus 5 (high)93.3
DeepSeek-V4-Pro91
Doubao-Seed-2.1-Pro-260628 (high)90.8
Gemini-3.7-Flash89.3
Kimi-K3 (high)88

Coding, including agents score

Original scores from this quarter’s closed benchmark; higher is better. Overall and task values are retained and are not ranked across quarters or tasks.: showing 8 of 15 records with values. See details for configurations and dates.

Chart data · 8 entries
Name points
GPT-5.5 (high)96.5
GPT-5.6-Sol (high)96.3
Qwen3.8-Max95.5
Claude Opus 5 (high)93.3
DeepSeek-V4-Pro91
Doubao-Seed-2.1-Pro-260628 (high)90.8
Gemini-3.7-Flash89.3
Kimi-K3 (high)88

Full results & model versions

15 / 15configurations have published scores in this scope. Scored configurations are listed; missing values remain “Not provided.” Different run configurations of the same model are listed separately.

Gemini-3.7-Flash

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Google · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Code score
89.3 分
Coding, including agents score
89.3 分

GLM-5.3

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Zhipu AI · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Code score
76.5 分
Coding, including agents score
76.5 分

Kimi-K3 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Moonshot · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 2.8T · Open weights

Code score
88 分
Coding, including agents score
88 分

Hy3-preview (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Tencent · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 295B · Open weights

Code score
82 分
Coding, including agents score
82 分

Doubao-Seed-2.1-Pro-260628 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: ByteDance · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Code score
90.8 分
Coding, including agents score
90.8 分

GPT-5.5 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: OpenAI · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Code score
96.5 分
Coding, including agents score
96.5 分

GPT-5.6-Sol (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: OpenAI · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Code score
96.3 分
Coding, including agents score
96.3 分

Kimi-K2.6 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Moonshot · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 1T · Open weights

Code score
74.5 分
Coding, including agents score
74.5 分

Qwen3.8-Max

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Alibaba · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 2.4T · Open weights

Code score
95.5 分
Coding, including agents score
95.5 分

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: DeepSeek · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 1.6T · Open weights

Code score
91 分
Coding, including agents score
91 分

Grok-4.6 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: xAI · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Code score
85 分
Coding, including agents score
85 分

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: DeepSeek · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 284B · Open weights

Code score
79 分
Coding, including agents score
79 分

Claude Opus 4.8 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Anthropic · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Code score
77.3 分
Coding, including agents score
77.3 分

MiniMax-M3

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: MiniMax · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

Parameters: 428B · Open weights

Code score
72.5 分
Coding, including agents score
72.5 分

Claude Opus 5 (high)

Model reported by the benchmark

As reportedOrganization: Anthropic · Model details ↗

Chat

Release date reported by the benchmark:

API

Code score
93.3 分
Coding, including agents score
93.3 分